A shortage of family-sized apartments

As published in The Washington Post on August 29, 2010,  Roger K. Lewis describes in his column “Shaping the City” that urban areas have few rental apartments suitable for families.  I would argue that many suburbs face the same issue.  He thoughtfully describes this issue as a challenge for smart growth.

Unsubsidized apartments built today are almost exclusively designed for and marketed to people without school-age children.

This situation poses a bit of a dilemma for anti-sprawl advocates aspiring to concentrate a significant amount of future metropolitan growth in more urban, environmentally sustainable communities. Through either new development or redevelopment, smart-growth planners seek to create compact, walkable communities with mixed uses, higher densities, access to transit, plenty of jobs and ample housing, especially workforce housing.

Yet in plans for new transit-oriented communities, most of the housing envisioned consists of apartment buildings or attached dwellings in which families with school-age children are unlikely to live.

Wenham readies for affordable home lottery

As published on August 17th in the Hamilton Wenham Chronicle, “Wenham readies for affordable home lottery” by Lucy R. Sprague Frederikson, describes the information session that Beth Rust and I presented on August 10th and Wenham’s new buy-down program.  The application deadline is September 16th.

A short excerpt:

Wenham held open houses for two affordable homes last week and followed up with an information session on how to obtain one. The event represents the culmination of a year’s work for Wenham’s Affordable Housing Trust (WAHT) and the first housing lottery in Wenham, which is scheduled for October.

Members of the WAHT, Board of Selectmen, town officials and two potential buyers attended the information session. According to Molly Martins, chairwoman of the WAHT and the Board of Selectmen, three or four families had visited each property during the two-hour open house and many applications had been taken from the Hamilton-Wenham Public Library. Town consultants Jennifer Goldson and Beth Rust hosted the information session, designed to give details on the process of applying to be in Wenham’s first housing lottery.

The first property is located at 105 Pleasant St., and is a three-bedroom single-family dwelling on an 8,200 square foot lot with 1,260 square feet of living space. The second property is at 11 Friend Court #2, and is a two-bedroom unit on 47,500 square foot lot with 1,080 square feet of living space on the second floor.

The Cost of Free Parking

Many of my readers may be uncomfortable with the subject of this article.  However, I believe it is an important topic to reflect on:  the actual costs of “free” parking.

The article, “Free Parking Comes at a Price” by Tyler Cowen, was published on August 14, 2010 in the New York Times.  Here is a short excerpt:

Car owners may not want to hear this, but we have way too much free parking.

Higher charges for parking spaces would limit our trips by car. That would cut emissions, alleviate congestion and, as a side effect, improve land use. Donald C. Shoup, professor of urban planning at the University of California, Los Angeles, has made this idea a cause, as presented in his 733-page book, “The High Cost of Free Parking.”

Many suburbanites take free parking for granted, whether it’s in the lot of a big-box store or at home in the driveway. Yet the presence of so many parking spaces is an artifact of regulation and serves as a powerful subsidy to cars and car trips. Legally mandated parking lowers the market price of parking spaces, often to zero. Zoning and development restrictions often require a large number of parking spaces attached to a store or a smaller number of spaces attached to a house or apartment block.

If developers were allowed to face directly the high land costs of providing so much parking, the number of spaces would be a result of a careful economic calculation rather than a matter of satisfying a legal requirement. Parking would be scarcer, and more likely to have a price — or a higher one than it does now — and people would be more careful about when and where they drove.

Livable Communities Act Passed the Banking Committee

As posted today on www.planetizen.com, “Score One for Livability” by Irvin Dawid (an excerpt): 

Senator Dodd’s Livable Communities Act passed a milestone on August 3 by passing the Banking Committee on a party line vote: 12-10. Known as a “smart growth planning” bill, it would integrate transportation with housing and economic planning.

Dodd’s bill would make ‘livability’ more than just a popular planning term but the essence of a $4 billion federal planning law that would help transportation plaining fit into sustainable development.

“If passed, the Act would provide $4 billion in competitive grants for projects that integrate transportation, housing, economic development and environmental planning. It would also establish a new Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities in the Department of Housing and Urban Development to coordinate federal policies that foster sustainable development ”

Wenham's New Buy Down Program

Together with my colleague, Beth Rust, I’m assisting the Wenham Municipal Affordable Housing Trust with launching a new buy down program.  The Trust has purchased two units (a single-family house and a condo in a two-family house) and is offering them for sale to low-income homebuyers through the Town’s new buy down program.  The Town is establishing a “ready-buyer list” through a lottery for these two initial units and also hopes to offer additional units in the future.  

We are holding open houses at the two units and an information session at Wenham Town Hall on Tuesday, August 10th (See flyer for more details:  Wenham Buy Down Program Flyer).   

For more information, please see the Town of Wenham website:  http://www.wenhamma.gov/ under “Affordable Housing Home-ownership Opportunities” or down load the application here:  Wenham Lottery Application Package 061610.  The application deadline is September 16th. 

As lottery agent, you can also contact me (Jennifer Goldson) directly for more information:  617-990-4971 or jennifer@jmgoldson.com.

Support SB 90 Today

Please send a message to Speaker DeLeo (‘Robert.DeLeo@state.ma.us’) today urging support of SB 90.  I’ve just sent him a message myself, as follows: 

Dear Speaker DeLeo:

I urge you to support SB 90 to improve the Community Preservation Act.  Massachusetts needs this bill passed now and not postponed any longer.

The CPA provides critical funds for projects that protect and preserve the hearts and souls of our communities in Massachusetts.  Historic resources, affordable housing, and open space are essential aspects of our quality of life and economic competitiveness – the very things that make our state desirable and livable.    

The problem is that CPA is broken and needs to be fixed.  SB 90 would fix CPA by making it feasible for urban areas to adopt, allow the rehabilitation of dilapidated parks and playgrounds, and ensure meaningful distributions from the State CPA Trust fund.

CPA funds also employ many contractors, like myself.  I am a freelance planner/sole proprietor, working from my home in Boston, and I specialize in helping communities implement the Community Preservation Act.  More than 95% of my business comes directly from CPA.  Many contractors including architects, builders, surveyors, appraisers, engineers, lawyers, planners, and other professionals and trades people rely on CPA funds to sustain their businesses.  I believe fixing and strengthening the CPA will help many small businesses like my own. 

Please don’t let this chance to fix the CPA slip by again.

Thank you for considering my point of view. 

Sincerely,

Jennifer M. Goldson, AICP

Principal of JM Goldson community preservation + planning

JM Goldson's Recent Successes

We’ve been very busy here at JM Goldson and we are happy to boast that our hard work is leading to quantifiable accomplishments.  Some highlights from the past few weeks:

  • The Westport Housing Trust’s Action Plan has helped the Trust get their first year of revenue (approved by Town Meeting last week).
  • Westport Town Meeting also approved the amended Inclusionary Housing bylaw to now allow cash payments and land donations to the Affordable Housing Trust.
  • Massachusetts Historical Commission approved our application to fund restoration work on the Bridgewater Academy Building. 
  • The Department of Housing and Community Development approved the Wenham Affordable Housing Trust’s marketing plan for a new Buy-Down Program under the state’s Local Action Unit program. 

Now it’s time to get back to work . . .

Easton’s TM Votes to Support Trust Budget

I’m pleased to announce the Easton Municipal Affordable Housing Trust’s success at securing 100% of its year one funding request at Town Meeting.  After my colleague, Beth Rust, and I completed our work to create an action plan and budget for Easton’s new Municipal Affordable Housing Trust, which included working directly with the members of the new Trust in addition to facilitating community input at a planning workshop, the trustees successfully carried the torch.

First, they took the plan and budget to the Easton Community Preservation Committee (CPC), presented a description of each priority initiative as laid out in the plan, and detailed how the budget relates directly to funding these initiatives.  Then, with CPC support, secured the Town Meeting vote to fully fund year one.

Easton’s Action Plan can be downloaded from the Town’s website.

Census mail-back rate in your community

To find out how well your community is doing in its 2010 US Census mail-back rate, check out this link on 2010.census.gov. The link provides access to an interactive map where you can check out the participation rate throughout the country.

The Rest of the Sustainability Story by Rypkema

Donovan Rypkema, principal of PlaceEconomics, offers his perspective on sustainability in the May/June 2010 issue of Planning magazine.  His is a valuable perspective that emphasizes the importance of broadening typical sustainability initiatives to include a critical component that is often overlooked: historic preservation. 

But consider what happens when we diligently recycle our soft drink cans while acquiescing in the destruction of older, still usable structures.  Razing a two-story mansion building wipes out the environmental benefit of recycling almost 1.5 million aluminum cans.  And that equation doesn’t even consider the loss of embodied energy in the building and its components.